I suspect most of the reason these IDE vs editor debates even
happen is because the editors by default don't do what IDEs do,
but can. All you've mentioned is possible in Emacs and has been
for basically forever.
Atila
On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 08:53:16 UTC, JN wrote:
On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 06:58:59 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 17:20 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
- no good IDE
Not entirely true, there are Emacs, VIM, LiteIDE, and others
for Go
development.
Never heard of LiteIDE, but Emacs and VIM aren't really IDEs,
they are just glorified text editors. When people say IDE, they
not only mean the text editing part, but the management of the
build process and visual debugging, including watches,
breakpoints, step-by-step debugging etc.
