On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 20:34:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/20/2015 8:25 AM, weaselcat wrote:
All of the content on rosettacode appears to be licensed under
GNU FDL, I
believe it would just have to be released under the GNU FDL or
a similar
copyleft license that fulfills the GNU FDL.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.2.html
Sigh, looks like we can't use it.
Most of the content was written by bearophile, no? He licensed
it to rosettacode, but is this an exclusive license - has he
actually given his sole rights to use his work them? If not, you
can use his work if he agrees. And I would guess if one asks
rosettacode nicely they might give rights to relicense all D
examples (ie especially the ones bearophile didn't write) under
boost for the dlang web site. And even if not, it's still worth
having them in a subdirectory under a different licence.
