On 25/03/2015 5:13 p.m., Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/24/15 8:00 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 25/03/2015 7:11 a.m., Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it for
awhile.
I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple part and
a pattern matching part.
The proposal wasn't yet formally accepted, partly because we wanted to
wait, whether more needs come up. By now it's already 2 years old and it
still looks complete IMO.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP32
There is one thing blatantly missing atleast to me.
Unpacking into function arguments.
void myfunc(int x, string y) {
// ...
}
myfunc({1, "hi!"}.unpack);
myfunc(tuple(1, "hi!").expand);
Andrei
In that case, +1 on my vote for being complete.
