On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 12:10:15 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 11:39:02 UTC, tcak wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 21:57:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/30/15 2:55 PM, Panke wrote:
I've implemented this in a library and I'm sure others have
as well. Are
you sure, you want a language solution?
With attributes? That might be palatable but only as a
standard solution. I'd want to add that to Phobos. -- Andrei
The "unittest" is a language thing. Why would name support be
put into library I don't get it.
unittest{} => Unnamed
unittest!"Testing new classes" {} => Named (Explained)
Becaused adding language features takes longer than using a
library, and every single feature, no matter how seemingly
simple, will increase the number of langauge bugs and lead to
more odd things happening.
I can understand this, and I agree with you. But this is no
different then ordinary businesses those do not care about
quality of their products or customer service as long as they
make profit. And as you know, we mostly swear at them due to this.
