Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:13:12 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
I'm not sure you will convince people to use foo.recycle() instead of
foo.delete(). Not only it's slower, I believe recycling an object
works for hiding bugs: accessing a recycled object - obviously a bug
- will no longer be detected.
Is anyone under the illusion that today there's any detection going on?
Andrei
There is none, but it's possible. It's just not implemented.
It's not possible if you allow actual memory reuse! Now I'm not sure I
understand what you want.
Andrei
