On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 20:44:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/15/2015 12:09 PM, "=?UTF-8?B?Ik3DoXJjaW8=?= Martins\"
<marcio...@gmail.com>\"" wrote:
Hi!
I use Appender a lot, and find it ugly to write this all the
time to
efficiently construct strings:
app.put("foo");
app.put(var);
app.put("bar");
How about this instead?
app.put("foo", var, "bar");
Agreed.
If a different name like putAll() is acceptable:
void putAll(A, T...)(A a, T items)
{
foreach (item; items){
a.put(item);
}
}
// ...
app.putAll("foo", var, "bar");
Ali
This is great!
I would still call it just put(), close to writeln()'s interface.
It shouldn't break any existing and compiling code, right?