On 4/16/2015 10:47 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2015-04-16 06:50:35 +0000, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> said:

I've been working on the Objective-C support for quite a while. I'm on my
third rewrite due to comments in previous pull requests. The latest pull
request [1] was created in January, it's basically been stalled since February
due to lack of review and Walter has not made a single comment at all in this
pull request.

I did the rewrites to comply with the requests Walter made in previous pull
requests. Although not present as a bugzilla issue with the "preapproved" tag,
I did interpreted it as preapproved based on a forum post made by you [2].

I know that focus has shifted to GC, reference counting, C++ and so on, but
you're not making it easy for someone to contribute.

[1] https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4321
[2] http://forum.dlang.org/post/lfoe82$17c0$1...@digitalmars.com

Back at the time I was working on D/Objective-C, my separate work on a feature
proposed in pull #3 (that const(Object)ref thing) got a similar treatment: no
comment from Walter in months. It's time-consuming to maintain a complex pull
request against a changing master branch, and it was abandoned at some point
because I got tired of maintaining it with no review in sight.

Using Github was a new thing back then, so I didn't necessarily expect the
review to go smoothly given #3 isn't a trivial change. But getting no comment at
all made me rethink things. It made me dread a similar fate would await
D/Objective-C. It was one of the reasons I stopped working on it. Now that Jacob
has taken over the Herculean task of making it work with current DMD after a few
years of falling behind and of refactoring it as a series of pull requests by
sub-feature to make it easier to review, I fear more and more it'll get the same
treatment as #3, ignored by Walter for several months (that's where we are now)
and then abandoned (when Jacob patience and/or spare time runs out).

It would be sad to see all those efforts wasted.

Yes it would. The problem is I have a hard time reviewing complex things I don't understand, so I procrastinate. The fault is mine, not with your work.

Reply via email to