dsimcha wrote: > I guess I could have implemented some of these suggestions, but the idea was > for > this lib to be very simple (it's only about 300 lines of code so far) and > agnostic > to the implementation of the integers it's working on top of, with the caveat > that, if you use something that's not arbitrary precision, the onus is on you > to > make sure nothing overflows. If anyone, for example, made a wrapper to the > GNU > multiprecision lib that looked like a D struct w/ operator overloading, it > would > be able to plug right into this library. If std.bigint improves, this library > will automatically benefit.
FWIW I use boost::rational quite a bit, and I've never felt the need to use bigints. -- Rainer Deyke - rain...@eldwood.com
