On Thursday, 23 April 2015 at 08:11:50 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 April 2015 at 22:23:30 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 04/22/2015 01:36 PM, Dicebot wrote:
-d is your enemy, If you remove that, there will be a clear
warning
"Deprecation: variable XXX.S.FLAG_ON immutable field with
initializer
should be static, __gshared, or an enum". You decided to
ignore and hide
it, why the surprise about the breakage?
Maybe using -d should itself emit a warning?
This does not help (-d is not problem), you can not protect me
from myself. Real problem is that changing semantics never end
up well. If I skip 2.066(and many versions before) version of D
compiler, I even do not get any deprecation or warning message.
Original code is 2 years old (which should be legacy code for
someone).
Skipping compiler versions during upgrade is asking for trouble
too. I don't remember it being done even for GCC - production
users always do it one major version step at a time. And C was
not supposed to change at all.
