On Monday, 4 May 2015 at 14:33:23 UTC, Baz wrote:
the following program fails because of the `put` function :
---
import std.stdio;
import std.range;
size_t readN(T, Range)(ref Range src, ref Range dst, size_t n)
if (isInputRange!Range && isOutputRange!(Range, T))
{
size_t result;
while(1)
{
if (src.empty || result == n)
break;
put(dst, src.front()); // here
src.popFront;
++result;
}
return result;
}
void main(string[] args)
{
int[] src = [1,2,3];
int[] dst = [0];
auto n = readN!int(src, dst, 2);
writeln(dst);
}
---
If i replace `put` by a cat op (`~`) it works, however the cat
op only works here because i test the template with two int[].
What's wrong ?
I believe the put(R,E) calls the doPut(R, E)
private void doPut(R, E)(ref R r, auto ref E e)
{
//...
else static if (isInputRange!R)
{
static assert(is(typeof(r.front = e)),
"Cannot nativaly put a " ~ E.stringof ~ " into a " ~
R.stringof ~ ".");
r.front = e;
r.popFront();
}
//...
}
So basically you put elements into the list until it is empty.
import std.stdio;
import std.range;
void main()
{
int [] list = new int [10];
writeln(list); //10 zeros
list.front = 5; //1 five and 9 zeroes
writeln(list);
list.popFront(); //9 zeroes left.
writeln(list);
}