Am Tue, 05 May 2015 08:41:13 -0700 schrieb Dan Olson <zans.is.for.c...@yahoo.com>:
> Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> writes: > > > If the cost is too much (ie: there is no heap), then we should be > > able to stop emutls from kicking in by preventing the D frontend > > from returning true on isThreadLocal calls. > > Iain, I think something like this would be good in GDC. Makes it so > much easier to compile for no thread environments. I'm not really sure about this. It's trivial to implement but it generates a semantic difference which harms code portability (e.g. if you have code where you want a global variable, don't mark it as __gshared and then move to an environment with threads).
