On Fri, 08 May 2015 16:59:59 +0000, Manfred Nowak wrote: > Jonathan M Davis wrote: > >> And why not just use another function instead of opEquals for what you >> want? > > Because the local `opEquals' _is_ the overload-function for `==' and > `!='. > > I guess that your "another function"-opinion holds for every form of > overloading. > > -manfred
i'd be VERY surprised if `==` or `!=` does any mutation. and i (like most programmers) don't like such surprises in code.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
