On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:51:44 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:48:01 UTC, weaselcat wrote:at the risk of sounding like a broken record, if ldc/gdc not being 2.067 stops a DDMD release due to dmd's generated code being too slow, maybe it's time to phase dmd out ;)Once SDC is at a point where it can compile most of or all D code that DMD compiles, it would be a good replacement.
Waiting for your PR :)