On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 18:20:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 17:54:38 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I was being deliberately quizzical because there are different
takes on
what you would call simd in the language, what set of types
are available
to you, what intrinsics are exposed (and how they are
exposed), etc.
Well, Manu would know that a lot better than I would. I hadn't
even heard of SIMD before he got Walter to put it into the
language, and I have yet to use it, though I do think that I
need to look into it at some point to see where I could take
advantage of it.
- Jonathan M Davis
D's simd library is difficult to use in comparison with gcc or
clang's extensions to C/C++.
bye,
