I forgot to mention, in terms of this statement I made:
I can't remember right now what the reasoning was for 'const ref' not to
take
rvalues in the first place. I think it was that you could escape the
reference,
but this isn't true anymore with DIP25 right?
I think someone brought this up about a weeks ago, and this
was Andrei's response:
Knee-jerk response: if no "return" attribute on a function it should be
safeto bind rvalues to ref parameters. Of course that's impractical as a
default
so explicit "auto ref" would be needed. -- Andrei
What's impractical?
Bit
