On Saturday, 6 June 2015 at 06:05:46 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 18:35:49 +0000, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 17:50:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
`const int` works, so i can't see why `auto auto` is failing.
Wrong analogy. Try `const const`, and it will fail with the
same error
as `auto auto`: "redundant attribute".
nope. in `auto auto` one `auto` is storage type, and another
`auto` is a
type placeholder.
No, as others have explained.
see, `const auto` works, so `auto` can play role of a
type placeholder. so `auto auto` should be accepted, if you
insists that
it can play a role of storage class.
`const auto` isn't contradictory. It's simply two storage
classes, one of which is the default.
Besides, there's not much sense in doing experiments with DMD to
find out "the true nature" of auto. DMD is clearly inconsistent,
as seen from your observation about foreach().
