On 06/08/2015 03:17 PM, ketmar wrote:
...
i tried to explain to some people why `foreach (i; 0..42)` doesn't reuse
previously declared `i` and failed.
The reason is that it wouldn't make any sense.
it doesn't look like variable declaration at all,
It looks like a variable declaration because it is a variable
declaration. It declares the foreach loop variable.
and there is no way to make it look like variable
declaration without specifying a type or `const/immutable/etc.`. so
"default storage class" doesn't make sense in `foreach`?
I didn't make the decision, but it is redundant.
