On 05/06/2015 21:29, extrawurst wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 19:02:15 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 01/06/2015 20:47, weaselcat wrote:
at the risk of sounding like a broken record, if ldc/gdc not being 2.067
stops a DDMD release due to dmd's generated code being too slow, maybe
it's time to phase dmd out ;)
It's past the time.
The traction and support that Rust gained, even before 1.0, showed
that having your primary toolchain based on GCC or LLVM is the only
sustainable way forward (and even of those two, GCC might not be able
to keep with LLVM).
Nice work on the RustDT IDE btw.
(https://users.rust-lang.org/t/rustdt-0-1-0-released-a-new-eclipse-rust-ide)
Thanks! (it already has more likes/stars in Github than DDT, even though
it's nowhere near as feature full :S )
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
