I'd definitely like to see a standard container for sets, instead of the void[0][T] thing I usually do.
Containers seems like the best thing to work on after the
allocators. Then you could start using the allocators for the
containers, so you can choose different allocation strategies for
them.
- Re: Right after allocators: contain... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators: co... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after alloca... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after al... Miles Stoudenmire via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after al... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right aft... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after alloca... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after al... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right aft... w0rp via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators: contain... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators: co... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after alloca... Joakim via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators: contain... ponce via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators: contain... weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators: contain... ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators: co... ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators: co... Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Right after allocators: contain... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d