On Tuesday, 16 June 2015 at 13:16:40 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Unfortunately not true, you're adding multiple alias this…
Excuse me for what I am trying to avoid overquoting :)
You probably refer to CLOS and not proper Lisp.
CLOS was adopted as part of the standard ANSI Common Lisp. What
is interesting to know ANSI Common Lisp is wrong?
C++ has multiple inheritance and "solves" it, but most C++
programmers try to avoid multiple inheritance anyway. So why
would D be better with it?
In different languages rhombus problem is solved in different
ways. And C++ is not the best case in point, where the problem is
solved well.
Of course, most of the C++-programmers avoid multiple
inheritance, but the other part, which uses it at least a little,
what a tie that does not use it.
D - this is not the language of minimalist (for example, Go) :)
We had to implement multiple inheritance, without relying on C++.
IMO.
