Re: Reduce has dreadful performance?

[Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 18:55:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Loop: 3.14s
Reduce 1: 4.76s
Reduce 2: 5.12s
This is DMD 2.067

Don't compare performance numbers on dmd, particularly not when 
assessing abstraction overhead.