On 22/06/2015 9:11 p.m., Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hey cool. Glad to hear you had no problems.
Sorry, I missed it. I had an early night last night (sunday night >_<)
.. Are there recordings to review?

There is indeed!
I'll be streaming again tonight FYI.

It's an interesting idea; knowing if a colour is convertible to some
other colour without loss... it sounds like it leads to implicit
conversion, but I don't think we want that here.
I'll think on how to do it. It's not really trivial.

It shouldn't be implicit. Never implicit. Always must be asked for.
I just want functions to tell me if it is loosing or gaining precision in the conversion. That way it can be e.g. logged.

On 22 June 2015 at 18:55, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On 22/06/2015 8:45 p.m., Andrea Fontana wrote:

On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 08:08:42 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:


Why would IImage support alpha? Shouldn't that be on the color?
If so, the PR does support it see RGBA8 and friends.


I said "on color or IImage". Anyway transparency is a property (mask) of
an image ("material") rather than of the color itself. A color has no
transparency, there's no transparency on gamut. It doesn't make sense
for a color: transparency is used only when you add an image over
another in order to sum the *colors* of two pixels. They used to pack
alpha informations with other pixel infos (color) just for simplicity
and to have a convenient way to store info inside a file, I guess.

I just had a look at antigrain. It really is beyond this code. Well
and truly out of scope.


I mean it would be useful to grab some ideas from it.
And that it would really wonderful to have something like this.

However I think it is useful to build the library and interfaces
thinking also to possible future developments.

Andrea


Humm, I can add it as an optional part of the interface like pixel offset.
Maybe. But it does feel a little less like other libraries out there.

The main reason I'm put off of antigrain is it feels a little too much
unwieldy to me.

But of course, I can't dismiss your guys suggestions so of course I'll dig
more deeper into it! Even if I do drag my heels a little bit.

Reply via email to