On 6/25/15 3:48 PM, Mathias Lang via Digitalmars-d wrote:
2015-06-25 21:28 GMT+02:00 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com <mailto:digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>>:On 6/24/15 11:12 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: So I actually implemented this. I made it a std.internal type so it can be used wherever you need to port string concatenation to a chain. Seems like Andrei has nixed this idea: "Please no breakages and no clever schemes and no overengineering." http://forum.dlang.org/post/mmhjqe$2mud$1...@digitalmars.com Oh well. I'm kind of done with the whole naming thing, there are better things I could (and probably should) be doing. Plus arguing against Walter and/or Andrei is kind of an uphill battle, especially if they both agree on something. I'll leave the branch up for anyone who wants to continue to try things with it, it was a very cool idea. And he's right. It is really annoying to update to a new version and have perfectly valid and working code breaking because someone had a nice idea. Ideally, we should only ever break code that has a bug in it.
Yeah, I agree for existing names, but these are unreleased new names. -Steve
