On 15 June 2015 at 02:55, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 19:02:59 UTC, weaselcat wrote: >> >> after playing around with ddmd built with ldc, it's still a solid 30-40% >> slower than current dmd(with optimization flags, obv.) > > > How did you build it? This is especially important given that DDMD straight > from the repo does not build with LDC right now as it tries to override the > druntime memory allocation functions, which works only due to the way DMD's > -lib is implemented. > > On a system with 64 GiB RAM, Daniel and I could not measure any performance > difference to the C++ version when building the Phobos unittests. >
Because 64GiB is such a commodity nowadays. :-)
