On Friday, 17 July 2015 at 20:59:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:54:31PM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/7/2015 2:16 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>So I thought we were supposed to replace bad names with good
>names. Template arguments are indexable, so "sequence"
>doesn't quite apply.
>
>What happened? Why are we replacing a crappy term with
>another crappy term?
Should just be "Aliases". I recall that my naming of
"setExt()" was universally panned for using an abbreviation.
"Aliases" doesn't carry any baggage about how it might be
accessed.
Wow, the bikeshedding truly never ends!
T
+1 , can we stop inserting coins in that machine every time it
reach some kind of stable point (especially when this stable
point is the same twice in a row ?)
