On 20 July 2015 at 19:10, Whatever via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 20 July 2015 at 11:45:31 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote: >> >> 2.1 Sounds good! > > > That version was already released in 2007 [1]. Version numbers are not > floats, they are period separated lists of integers. So `assert(2.1 == 2.01 > && 2.01 == 2.001);`.
You might be able to get away with 2.001 == 2.0.01 and 2.1 == 2.1.00. :o) On a serious note though, the versioning could be better, and I think the current suggested version bump from Walter is a missed opportunity to set things right. To quote anther project leader though: "Let’s face it - what’s the point of being in charge if you can’t pick the bike shed color without holding a referendum on it?" Iain