On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:17:21 +0000, Martin Nowak wrote:

> - The backend generates pretty bad code, we'll never be able to catch up
> with good optimizers. Why should we invest in an outdated backend?

the one reason is that it's small and doesn't require 3rd-party libraries 
to build. while it's not the best backend out here, change-compile-full-
rebuild cycle is very fast for DMD, and doesn't require to install gcc 
sources or llvm.

yet i'm not sure that this reason will outweigh the translation and 
maintenance burden.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to