On 07/26/15 17:56, Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Sunday, 26 July 2015 at 14:49:40 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: > Well, no. That does not follow. We can have both a with statement and a with > expression. > > Mmm... but how will we differ them?
There's no need for that. (hint: "mixin"). But, unlike support for with-declarations (which would be a significant improvement) I'm not sure if with-expression would make sense (and the lifetimes might be too unintuitive -- they'd be different for with-statements and -expressions). artur
