On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:08:43 +1200, Rikki Cattermole wrote: > I think you mean dlopen, dlsym and dlclose. Not full file system access > geez.
and root privs requirement. just to complement it all. > We are already getting so close to have a full blown CTFE implementation > that it isn't funny. i'm starting to think that CTFE was a big mistake. while it's ok in languages like Forth and Scheme, it seems to suits c-like languages bad. people feels something wrong with it, but can't exactly see what is wrong. and the only way to fix it is to drop it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
