On Wednesday, 9 September 2015 at 16:58:41 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 21:11 +0000, qznc via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
Yes. I'm not sure how to structure this whole suite. The
general goal is "D claims that it can match C/C++ in
performance, let's have some actual numbers". So far D mostly
disappoints in terms of performance.
[…]
Which D compilers are you testing with?
The benchmark records all versions:
https://qznc.github.io/d-shootout/
I have found DMD to be OK but often a bit slow compared to C++
codes
using GCC and Clang. However, LDC and GDC generally create
executables
from D codes that are at least as fast as C++ with GCC and
Clang.
Yes, that is the general opinion. However, I have a hard time to
reach the obscenely tuned C++ programs.
