On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 16:25:09 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Where do you think is a limit to applicability of a
turing-complete language?
?
Pointers are of little use for a type that is always reference
type.
You can have many different types of references.
Make them not compile? @nogc does exactly that.
No, make the features work well without GC or change them.
Reducing GC usage and emscripten backend are actionable if you
want to work on them.
Changing the language is not "actionable" without creating a fork.
Regarding Emscripten, I don't see much value in spending so much
work on getting something that isn't good enough to work. A
higher level approach is needed for compact code gen. Possibly
also language adjustments.
