Re: 0 in version number?

[bitwise via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 18 October 2015 at 02:26:22 UTC, Shriramana Sharma 
wrote:
bitwise wrote:

touch f1.098
touch f1.099
touch f1.1.0
touch f1.1.1
ls

Sorry don't understand what you are getting at...

Not sure what you're getting at either.