On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 23:11:34 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 21:01:29 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 11/09/2015 09:13 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
Yet another shallow language comparison that needs to be
corrected:
https://www.quora.com/Which-language-has-the-brightest-future-in-replacement-of-C-between-D-Go-and-Rust-And-Why/answer/Matej-%C4%BDach?srid=itC4&share=1
My response: https://goo.gl/VTEYFk -- Andrei
Great post, though languages that compile to C (e.g. Nim) are
probably even better at interfacing with C/C++ than D. I'm sure
D is #1 aside those though.
IMO D gets a plus here for being so C-like which makes
interfacing with C a more enjoyable experience. It's very easy to
write D in an "improved C" way.
