On 11/12/2015 11:50 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I would love to be convinced. :) Can someone come up with a reduced
example please?
On 11/12/2015 03:59 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> for (i=0; i < 1000000; ++i) {
> fmttable(table);
> }
I think what we are seeing here is more due to the unused side-effect in
the loop, where compiling with -w fails compilation:
Warning: calling deneme.fmttable without side effects discards return
value of type string, prepend a cast(void) if intentional
Ali
Can someone please tell me if I am mistaken not.
Once again, I don't think this example is fast because the compiler
reuses the return value of fmttable() in the loop. Rather, it simply
removes the whole expression because its only side-effect is not used in
the program.
Perhaps that's what everybody else is saying anyway. :)
(Why don't I look at the assembly myself? Going to a meeting... :p)
Ali
