On 30/11/2015 10:42 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote: >
Exactly, the D module system would still be in place. Assuming they were in defferent modules, then the D module system would keep them out of conflict naturally, with rules identical to the normal D rules. I imagined this; C++ namespace is for mangling, D module is for scoping. That's not how it seems to be, so my intuition was dead wrong, but my weekend's experience has convinced me it would be better how I initially intuited. Thing is, we're presenting a C++ API to D, so we want to present it in D's terms, that is, the API is distributed among D modules in a way that makes sense to a D user. I don't want to present the API in C++ terms, and it's not even practical; stuffing the entire C++ API into a single D module is crazy. In the cases I'm interested in, the C++ API is possibly larger than the entire D codebase that's attached to it.
You're not the only one who thought it should be that way.
