On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 04:02:39 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
It's possible that those cache misses will be irrelevant when the requests actually do something, is it not? When a lot of different requests are competing for cache lines, I'd assume it's shuffling it enough to change these readings
I believe cache-misses problem is related to old vibed version. There was to many context switch. Now vibed uses SO_REUSEPORT socket option. It reduces context switch count radically.
