On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 03:00:33 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Friday, 15 January 2016 at 11:58:19 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 14:28:05 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
[...]
True that. I think it's great to keep evolving the language
and making it better, on the other hand, if D is to get
serious adoption, then everything, especially the basics like
debuggability, quality of codegen and compiler bugs will need
to be solid. D as a language is already powerful enough to
thrash the competition, this is why we love it. But the reason
it's experiencing slow adoption, is because of tooling and
general implementation quality, and the lower threshold of
tolerance from the general population.
I think what he was pointing out is that many D features are
currently barely functioning or not working and adding more
features is just a waste of time.
Yes, that was the larger point.
