Yigal Chripun Wrote: > for instance there's special handling of void return types so it would > be easier to work with in generic code. instead of this compiler hack a > much simpler solution is to have a unit type and ditch C style void. the > bottom type should also exist mainly for completeness and for a few > stdlib functions like abort() and exit()
uint and void return types may be nearly equivalent for x86 architecture, CLI makes strong difference between them.
