On 2009-10-27 09:07:06 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> said:
My current thought is to ascribe lhs ~ rhs the same type as lhs
(thereby making ~ consistent with ~= by making lhs ~= rhs same as lhs =
lhs ~ rhs) in case lhs is a string type. If lhs is a character type,
the result type is obviously the same as rhs.
Seems the most intuitive option to me. Also, it makes "a ~= b"
equivalent to "a = a ~ b" which is always nice.
--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/
