On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 06:13:32 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Thursday, 28 January 2016 at 05:39:55 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
It really comes down to that an array qualifies as an Lvalue
operator; But I _think_ this is a bug in the language since
you should be able to assign a new Rvalue to a new array
element just being created/added. We'll have to get input from
Walter or Andrei.
Alright, closest bug match i could find is
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7032 which is sorta
the same thing, but not quite...
Ah, ok. A bug is better than a language design limitation -- it
might get fixed at some point! I'll figure out a workaround for
my use case.
Thanks for all the time you spent, I appreciate the help.
