On Friday, 12 February 2016 at 19:20:29 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 02/12/2016 02:18 PM, Meta wrote:
On Friday, 12 February 2016 at 19:00:29 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Tried that for a while, it quickly became a mess of entangled
intestines. Not worth it. -- Andrei
What do you think of the solution I proposed above? It's not
pretty but
there has to be some kind of workaround. Not being able to use
`parallel` with an iota-range of ulongs on 32-bit DMD is not
good. If
you will pre-approve it (comments/suggestions optional) I can
submit a
PR within the next day or so.
I'd be more partial to an additional template parameter. Or
even change the type of length in certain cases. -- Andrei
Okay, I will look into other solutions and post some options soon.
