On 2/13/2016 2:27 AM, Daniel N wrote:
"Abstract
This is the proposed wording for a unified call syntax based on the idea that
f(x,y) can invoke a member function, x.f(y), if there are no f(x,y). The inverse
transformation, from x.f(y) to f(x,y) is not proposed."

They were considering 6 alternatives and chose the worst...
https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P0251R0.pdf

Wasn't it us who chose the term UFCS?

Reply via email to