On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 12:22:20 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/17/2016 09:28 PM, rsw0x wrote:
I'm curious where Andrei stands on this issue, IIRC he was
upset at one
point that dmd could not be redistributed properly on linux
distros.
We'd love dmd's backend to have a more permissive license, and
we have tried to make it so. Regardless, the dmd compiler is an
important part of the D ecosystem and is here to stay. -- Andrei
Andrei, I agree with that. DMD is important and should be where
most of the exploratory action happens. But does it really have
to be the "face" of the D language?
