Re: Uniform Function Call Syntax?

[Wyatt via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 07:45:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:

I think it would be better idea to just add the ability to add 
unicode operators, and to avoid precedence issues one could 
just require them to use parentheses. That way you could define 
opCustom"•" and use it as:

I've mentioned this before, but I think a constrained set of 
user-defined operators using annotations/affixes on the existing 
set is a better fit for D.  It's a lesson well-learned from other 
languages (cf. OCaml; F#), and fits with D's generally practical 
bent.

I mean, if you want to alias them to Lucky Charms or various 
hieroglyphs of birds disemboweling men later, I guess maybe 
that's could work? But I really don't want any language features 
predicated on the programmer having an APL keyboard.

-Wyatt