On Tuesday, 8 March 2016 at 15:33:21 UTC, krzaq wrote:
C++17 was supposed to be a major release. They decided to turn it into major joke instead.

Well, it is the standard that is delayed. Implementations are on the way. "STL" points out that Microsoft will follow GCC by implementing concepts, but that Ballmer had put the compiler on hold for a few years so they have to play catch up on the compiler internals first. If you have a defacto-standard in the compilers then ISO will follow suit, that's the purpose of standardization.

But modules ought to have been in C++11... so it is annoying if they don't get it in C+17.

Reply via email to