On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 23:47 +0000, Andrew via Digitalmars-d wrote: […] > One of awful things about programming in many languages is that > there's a gazillion tools you need to tack-on before you can do > any engineering. In C++ that includes Doxygen for documentation, > C++Unit for unit tests, gprof, gcov, valgrind, and so on. One of > the nice things about D is that so much of this is part of the > language or build into DMD.
No-one should be using C++Unit for testing in C++ codes. USe a header only system such as Catch or CUTE. > So yes, sure, you can add what ever you like the Java and claim > its just as good (or better). The difference is that in D its all > right there already. And Java is already right there in the context of teaching. Adding bits to an extent infrastructure is easier that revolutionizing the infrastructure. Been there done this three times: far too many academics are weighed down by inertia when it comes to changing their infrastructure. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
