On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:25:26 +0000, deadalnix wrote: > On Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 18:06:28 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: >> https://peerj.com/preprints/1733/ >> >> "Surprisingly, our results show that women's contributions tend to be >> accepted more often than men's. However, when a woman's gender is >> identifiable, they are rejected more often." >> >> > It is not peer reviewed and for good reasons.
It's from a source with many peer-reviewed articles, and you're not providing any evidence at all, peer reviewed or otherwise, to counter it.
