On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 15:50 +0000, Jin via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 March 2016 at 15:22:26 UTC, Casey Sybrandy wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Have you considered using a Disrupter 
> > > (http://lmax-exchange.github.io/disruptor/) for the channels?  
> > > Not sure how it compares to what you're using from Vibe.d, but 
> > > it's not a hard data structure to implement and, IIRC, it 
> > > allows for multiple producers and consumers.
> > Oh, and yes, I know that it would have to be rewritten in D 
> > unless there's a C version somewhere.  I actually did it once 
> > and it wasn't too bad.  I don't think I have a copy anymore, 
> > but if I do find it, I can put it up somewhere.
> This is java bloatware. :-(

I think that is probably just slander.

Whilst there are some known problems with The Disruptor, blithely
labelling it "java bloatware" is most likely an uneducated, and
probably ill-judged, comment.
  
-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to