On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 15:50 +0000, Jin via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Wednesday, 30 March 2016 at 15:22:26 UTC, Casey Sybrandy wrote: > > > > > > > > Have you considered using a Disrupter > > > (http://lmax-exchange.github.io/disruptor/) for the channels? > > > Not sure how it compares to what you're using from Vibe.d, but > > > it's not a hard data structure to implement and, IIRC, it > > > allows for multiple producers and consumers. > > Oh, and yes, I know that it would have to be rewritten in D > > unless there's a C version somewhere. I actually did it once > > and it wasn't too bad. I don't think I have a copy anymore, > > but if I do find it, I can put it up somewhere. > This is java bloatware. :-(
I think that is probably just slander. Whilst there are some known problems with The Disruptor, blithely labelling it "java bloatware" is most likely an uneducated, and probably ill-judged, comment. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part