Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:53:12 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote:

This question may actually belong in .learn.

What's exactly eliminated from the header generated with -H? I tried it just now and was surprised to see that the generated .di file includes the function bodies of regular (non-template) functions and methods.

I was under the impression that generated headers exclude function bodies, and found documentation to support that viewpoint:

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html#interface_files

says:

============
A D interface file contains only what an import of the module needs, rather than the whole implementation of that module.

The advantages of using a D interface file for imports rather than a D source file are:

* D interface files are often significantly smaller and much faster to process than the corresponding D source file. * They can be used to hide the source code, for example, one can ship an object code library along with D interface files rather than the complete source code.
============

This strongly suggests that function bodies are eliminated. But what I'm seeing is that pretty much all function bodies are kept (exception: static this() functions are not), and only comments are removed.

So what's -H really doing?

It removes whitespace and comments.

My understanding of why it does not remove implementations is for CTFE and inlining.

Somehow I got it in my head that a significantly large enough function would have it's body removed, but I can't remember why I think that...

You're right. I just added a loop to a function, and its body disappeared from the .di file. Thanks!

The CTFE-ability of functions seems to play no role in they being kept around, however.

Note that the above snippit from the docs suggests reasons for using d interface files, *NOT* reasons for using dmd -H :)

Yeah, I'd agree if the link didn't come from the same page's explanation of -H.

I think the doc should be clearer about the fact that the compiler has the freedom to keep whichever function bodies it finds fit for inlining.


Andrei

Reply via email to