On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 20:50:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 20:06:39 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 23.04.2016 21:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Should we use a single <br>? -- Andrei
That would look better in the case you linked, but it would be
a step back with longer signatures. E.g.
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm_searching.html#.endsWith
I still can't get over the ridiculous grey constraints. WTF.
But what we could do is add a margin-bottom to them if needed,
while keeping the others hugged up.
BTW this is what it looks like on my docs:
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/std.algorithm.searching.endsWith.4.html
Only thing I dislike about it is that the "Overload: <short
signature>" thing of the currently selected overload vanishes
completely, instead of just changing color to suggest it is the
active one you selected.
Also, your search currently does not list modules as search
results (try searching base64, it will only show things like the
Base64/Base64Impl things etc).
Anyhow I really should be using your docs by now, seems the
timeframe where you hit a "this has not been implemented yet,
sorry"-warning on half the links you click on is finally over and
being able to actually read constraints and having a better
overview (via the toggling of the full signature) with function
overloads alone are huge selling points, not to mention it does
not try to cram the documentation for whole modules on a single
page but splits it nicely into single pages for functions etc.
